Francis Charette-Migneault

> Good luck finding agreement - I have changed my mind twice while writing this... and > ``` > inputs: > work_units: > type: int > requirements: > hardware: >...

> > > Proposal from the 2020-06-23 CWL meeting: > > ```yaml > CUDARequirement: > runtimeMin: 10.2 # (Optional) Minimum CUDA (runtime link library) runtime version (major, minor) > capabilitiesMin:...

Makes sense to me to have `runtime.cuda`.

@mr-c The provided security considerations looks good IMO. Thanks for filling the request.

@mr-c Thanks for the explanation. The input expression should be sufficient in most use cases, and `InlineJavascriptRequirement` could be used for more advanced validation. So probably there wouldn't be much...

> So it seems that in CWL v1.0.x and v1.1, that `File`s in `type: File[]` output must either all have the same format or no format. This is the behavior...

@bblommers Is it possible to consider pinning `werkzeug` only if the server is used (e.g.: via `moto[server]` or similar)? I am only using the `s3` portion of `moto`, and as...

@bblommers How did you test this? I have tried with a very basic setup and it seems to behave exactly as intended as shown below. ```python from setuptools import setup,...

@bblommers Everything seems to work as expected in my project. Thanks for the update.

@gadomski As mentioned in the original description, the only indication in #1249 is that it "has significant issues with its current implementation", and this in itself doesn't really tell us...