Cleanup flyte propeller
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Cleans up unused functions, variables, redundant conditions, unused variables, string format issues, redundant type declarations.
How was this patch tested?
Unit tests
Check all the applicable boxes
- [x] I updated the documentation accordingly.
- [x] All new and existing tests passed.
- [x] All commits are signed-off.
Related PRs
Docs link
Summary by Bito
- This pull request enhances the Flyte propeller codebase by removing unused functions and variables, which may introduce risks if any of these elements were previously relied upon.
- Eliminates redundant conditions, potentially affecting code behavior if not thoroughly validated.
- Addresses string format issues and redundant type declarations, leading to improved code readability and maintainability.
- These changes improve code readability and maintainability without altering existing functionality.
- Overall summary: cleans up the Flyte propeller codebase by removing unused code and redundant elements, which introduces potential risks.
Bito Automatic Review Skipped - Draft PR
Bito didn't auto-review because this pull request is in draft status.
No action is needed if you didn't intend for the agent to review it. Otherwise, to manually trigger a review, type /review in a comment and save.
You can change draft PR review settings here, or contact your Bito workspace admin at [email protected].
Codecov Report
:x: Patch coverage is 57.35294% with 29 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
:white_check_mark: Project coverage is 59.73%. Comparing base (68fc4e6) to head (c268a92).
:warning: Report is 35 commits behind head on master.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #6516 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 58.58% 59.73% +1.14%
==========================================
Files 929 929
Lines 70851 57985 -12866
==========================================
- Hits 41510 34636 -6874
+ Misses 26194 20195 -5999
- Partials 3147 3154 +7
| Flag | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| unittests-datacatalog | 60.30% <ø> (+1.27%) |
:arrow_up: |
| unittests-flyteadmin | 57.86% <ø> (+1.74%) |
:arrow_up: |
| unittests-flytecopilot | 43.16% <ø> (+3.60%) |
:arrow_up: |
| unittests-flytectl | 65.36% <ø> (+0.71%) |
:arrow_up: |
| unittests-flyteidl | 78.64% <ø> (+2.52%) |
:arrow_up: |
| unittests-flyteplugins | 62.02% <ø> (+0.91%) |
:arrow_up: |
| unittests-flytepropeller | 55.61% <57.35%> (+0.55%) |
:arrow_up: |
| unittests-flytestdlib | 64.00% <ø> (+0.88%) |
:arrow_up: |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
:rocket: New features to boost your workflow:
- :snowflake: Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
Bito Automatic Review Skipped - Draft PR
Bito didn't auto-review because this pull request is in draft status.
No action is needed if you didn't intend for the agent to review it. Otherwise, to manually trigger a review, type /review in a comment and save.
You can change draft PR review settings here, or contact your Bito workspace admin at [email protected].