wip - Move flytekit to monorepo
Tracking issue
NA
Why are the changes needed?
Prior to this PR, changes in flytekit that require an updated flyteidl need to happen in 2 steps: (1) pin flyteidl in flytekit to a SHA, and once flyteidl is released (2) pin flyteidl version in flytekit to the released version.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Move flytekit to the monorepo.
As mentioned in the title, this is wip as there are a bunch of open questions, including:
- how this affects the release process
- changes to monodocs
- the relevant generated code (i.e. the code under
flyteidl/gen/pb_pythonis symlinked). i. I couldn't figure out how to specify a path to a relative dependency in pip. According to https://stackoverflow.com/questions/75159453/specifying-local-relative-dependency-in-pyproject-toml, pip doesn't have support for this. Other package managers like poetry, pdm, and hatch do.
How was this patch tested?
Setup process
Screenshots
Check all the applicable boxes
- [ ] I updated the documentation accordingly.
- [ ] All new and existing tests passed.
- [ ] All commits are signed-off.
Related PRs
Docs link
Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 58.96%. Comparing base (
e39acc7) to head (0c6a808). Report is 10 commits behind head on master.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #4923 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 58.91% 58.96% +0.04%
==========================================
Files 645 645
Lines 55412 55506 +94
==========================================
+ Hits 32648 32731 +83
+ Misses 20181 20177 -4
- Partials 2583 2598 +15
| Flag | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| unittests | 58.96% <ø> (+0.04%) |
:arrow_up: |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.