[BUG] Flytectl returns the oldest workflow version when using --latest flag

[LeHyperion]

Describe the bug

Description: When attempting to retrieve the latest version of a workflow using the --latest flag with flytectl get workflow, I am presented with the oldest version instead of the expected latest version.

Expected behavior

Expected Result: The latest version of the specified workflow should be returned.

Actual Result: The oldest version of the workflow is returned.

Additional context to reproduce

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Run the following command:

flytectl get workflow -p MY_PROJECT -d DEV WORKFLOW_NAME --latest

2. Observe the returned workflow version.

Environment/Configuration:

• Flytectl version: 0.6.45

Additional Notes: This issue could potentially impact users who rely on fetching the latest version for their operational needs.

Screenshots

No response

Are you sure this issue hasn't been raised already?

• [X] Yes

Have you read the Code of Conduct?

• [X] Yes

[welcome[bot]]

Thank you for opening your first issue here! 🛠

[LeHyperion]

Should this be wVersions[len(wVersions)-1].Id.Version?

https://github.com/flyteorg/flytectl/blob/145bc5c01db75a21254626ecba0e01d6dbea7851/pkg/ext/workflow_fetcher.go#L52C11-L52C31

[eapolinario]

@LeHyperion , since you already did an initial investigation, can you open a PR? It should be fairly simple to build a local copy of flytectl, just follow https://github.com/flyteorg/flytectl/blob/master/docs/source/contribute.rst.

I can help review the change.

[LeHyperion]

Hi @eapolinario here is the PR for the fix. https://github.com/flyteorg/flytectl/pull/418

[github-actions[bot]]

Hello 👋, this issue has been inactive for over 9 months. To help maintain a clean and focused backlog, we'll be marking this issue as stale and will engage on it to decide if it is still applicable. Thank you for your contribution and understanding! 🙏

[RRap0so]

@eapolinario or @wild-endeavor found this one with the stale label and created a quick PR to get this out. Any chance you could take a looK?