FEAT: change SizeConstraint ignoreSize defualt to true

[6a209]

The expression "0 < width < 100000" has the same effect as "ignoreSize = true" but adding these two conditions in SQL might degrade performance somewhat.

[AlexV525]

Changing the flag would be a breaking change for users who wrote a valid condition but didn't toggled the flag before.

[6a209]

But it originally felt like there was wrong, the default value theory should be unconditional, which would be more reasonable. However, a condition (0 < width < 100000) was added by default. If I really have an image larger than 100000, wouldn't it fail to be filtered out? I think this is not the expected behavior of the user. But then again, 100000 is really too large, almost non-existent such big images, and if such an image were to be loaded into memory all at once, it would definitely cause outofmemory,

[AlexV525]

But it originally felt like there was wrong, the default value theory should be unconditional, which would be more reasonable.

If we could convert 100000 to null, that would be more reasonable.