Rajas
Rajas
It appears there's a lot of scope to create duplication and conflict with the existing attributes in the Authentication event class. I would recommend, taking a deeper at the existing...
Yep, good to close
Agreed, no reason to maintain a separate registry. Just note that, this will be a breaking change and we'll need to consider it for v2.0 of the schema.
Tracking in https://github.com/ocsf/ocsf-schema/issues/1383.
Thanks for doing this! A general question, based on your review of the objects you updated, do you see a need to add more attributes in any of the objects?...
@jonrau-at-queryai @ocsf/ocsf-maintainers is this one still required?
Agreed, it does make sense to lower the requirement of base_score in the reputation object. And apologies, we couldn't get to this issue earlier. @lcostantino feel free to create a...
@pladamgregory as requested in your previous as well, can you add a real event/log that you are trying to normalize? A raw and a normalized version of the event that...
In your example, you have only used the key:value pair - `metrics` object. Can you demonstrate how other objects are used and why are they needed? Currently, it appears that...
I agree, this is very much intentional and not a bug. Many objects have "instances" (think attributes of type object) which have differing names. This can be for multiple reasons,...