Floris Lambrechts

Thanks for looking at this! This should definitely make it into the next release.

Do you have other examples of part aliases (outside of PEP440)?

> * Does there seem to be any more intuitive way to allow the user to specify aliases versus the example shown above? You could consider leaving `values` as-is showing...

> I have a half-baked feature branch that partially implements the ability to specify aliases in bumpversion `values` config. Do you support _serializing_ with aliases as well? If you only...

This branch needs a rebase.

I agree that bumpversion should not rewrite its configuration file. I've lost commented-out lines on multiple occasions and that should not happen. This is a promising approach! However currently many...

Hi, Would this proposed feature work for you? https://github.com/c4urself/bump2version/issues/57

The test should also verify that the file content is still intact in the correct encoding. I'll take a look.

Hi 4hopp, I extended the test a bit. If you approve that merge in your branch (next time, create a separate feature branch for it!), then this can go in.

Does this not bring the version in the config out of sync with the other version numbers?