Results 27 comments of Spencer Florence

1. https://github.com/florence/cover/issues/102 to avoid recompiling which is one of the slowest parts of cover. Annother issue here is because cover annotates higher phases a *lot* of the extra run time...

The TL;DR is yes, I would like to use cover to get multifile and crossphase coverage into drracket, someday. (note: Multifile coverage was a thing at somepoint http://blog.racket-lang.org/2011/05/multi-file-code-coverage-viewing-tool.html ) Long...

Oh. Since file coverage is already in DrRacket, albeit in a weird place: "Choose Language" (bottom left) -> "Show Details" -> "Syntactic test suite coverage".

> Cover uses errortrace as well correct? Yes. > cover shouldn't behave differently... Yes: in the single file case they should generate the same information. In the multifile case cover...

It would be better to open issues now I think. Worst case we can triage them as "fix later".

Adding just `(list 'exists (current-directory))` doesn't fix the problem for me. But i maybe I'm running from a different directory? (I'm on mac, so I'm getting the `org.racket-lang.prefs.rktd` version of...

@mflatt Ah right! w/ that fixed `(list 'exists (current-directory))` also fixes the problem for me.