Behavior change for bot.recall('not yet stored key')?

[jpjpjp]

Did the update of the new storage/redis module change the overall behavior of storage?

This is sample code from Hotel California:

var htc = bot.recall('htc');
 // if htc has not been initialized to bot memory...
  if(!htc) {
    htc = bot.store('htc', {});
    // store default value
    htc.enabled = false;
  }

I have similar code to this in my bot, but since doing an npm update, I'm now getting a non-null value returned when the key has never been set. Rather it returns an unhandled error object. I also see:

Potentially unhandled rejection [1] Error: bot.recall() could not find the value referenced by id/key at Object.recall (/Users/jshipher/Dropbox/dev/node/tropo-jira-notification-bot/node_modules/node-flint/storage/memory.js:60:32)

I can handle this in my code, but wondered if this behavior is planned/expected.

[nmarus]

Unexpected, but yes, you are correct. The bot.store/recall/forget code was refactored a few commits back along with the memory storage module to return or reject promises instead of returning a null value. The above would look something like this. I'll update the readme htc example.

bot.recall('htc')
  .then(function(htc) {
    // if htc is found
    // [ ... ]
  })
  .catch(function(err) {
    // if htc is not found
    htc = bot.store('htc', {});
    // store default value
    htc.enabled = false;
  });

Of note, the redis storage module still uses the old behavior. I had removed it during a previous commit, it is back now but should be refactored to be interchangeable with the memory storage module.