Flavio Castelli
Flavio Castelli
> Another option is to provide a fork maintained by the Kubewarden team. I think we should go that way given the maintainer doesn't seem to be actively maintaining it
Let's wait a bit before writing tests for the models. There are good chances portions of these files are going to be covered by the integration/new unit tests we will...
I think we should tackle https://github.com/kubewarden/kubewarden-controller/issues/660 before we go and improve the code coverage of the PolicyServer reconciliation loop. That's because there's quite some code we can delete once we...
@Martin-Weiss, @raif-ahmed can you check the description of the policy to ensure it matches your requirements? I've added the mutation bits to the policy requirements, I think it would be...
@Martin-Weiss, good point. I would however add this check to the https://github.com/kubewarden/kubewarden-controller/issues/590 policy. What do you think about this idea?
@tnytown no worries, ping me on the other PR when it's ready to be reviewed
Closing, this has been fixed
Closing, this is no longer needed with the latest changes that landed into the `main` branch
@mssola can you take a look into that?
> I guess I'll take a further look into the gpg command, to see if there's something I can use. Otherwise, I'm afraid that the only option left is to...