Michael Flanakin

@kk09v We provide x_ResourceGroupName, so you'll have that for Microsoft data. I think the main question right now is would you consider AccountHierarchy as a blocker to adoption? If so,...

Yes, resource hierarchy is provider specific. We would define a generic way to convey what the hierarchy is which would be provider-agnostic, making it easier to apply logic across providers....

It's not static. It can change multiple times within an hour. So I suppose that depends on whether someone wants to track costs back to where they were when the...

> Commitment Discount is confusing (maybe Commitment-based discount is not much better). When many agree to an EDP, they're also making a 'commitment' for an amount of spend for the...

It just depends on how useful and consistent we want to be. If it's inconsistent, then I'm not sure it'll be useful. Looking to hear from practitioners here, tho.

@marc-perreaut Not necessarily. Specifically, BillingAccountType for Microsoft EA would be "Billing Account" and for MCA would be "Billing Profile". That's why I proposed adding this. It's trying to address the...

I would bring them in together and let the crew that works on them decide whether they should be added or not. But exchange rates are necessary in order to...

@mike-finopsorg This is about other discounts, not commitment discounts. @kk09v I haven't thought about this level of detail but I suspect you're right about savings calculation. This was more intended...

Updated the description to be clearer about what this is about. Hope that helps.

What do you mean by "how it was burned down"? A partial commitment would result in 2 rows. One with the committed usage and one with the uncommitted usage. Does...