Thomas Fitzsimmons
Thomas Fitzsimmons
Commenting in response to the inactivity prompt; I am still watching this one, waiting for a reviewer. I am ready to take action on any feedback I receive.
/contributor add @gnu-andrew
Hi @gnu-andrew, I have corrected your contributor status, thank you for the reminder. I do not have access to comment on https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8185896. Can you please add a comment from me...
Thank you for reviewing @jerboaa. I will work on implementing your suggestions.
I pushed the review suggestions. There were two GitHub Actions failures on `macos-aarch64`, but they look to be occurrences of this existing bug: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8247940.
Sounds good @jaikiran. I can provide some background about this pull request; it was the result of discussions on a related jdk8u-dev pull request (https://github.com/openjdk/jdk8u-dev/pull/452). Red Hat has been shipping...
Hi @AlanBateman, when you have a chance can you take a look at the tests I added? Do you think they are sufficient?
_I am not a Reviewer; I maintain `java-17-openjdk` in `RHEL` so I try to review `jdk17u-dev` pull requests, time-permitting._ @mrserb can you try re-running the failed GitHub Actions checks? The...
Why wait to rename? Virtual provides could be added for backward-compatibility with the non-JPackage naming.
See http://www.jpackage.org for the history of the efforts that arrived at these naming conventions.