Oliver Stöneberg
Oliver Stöneberg
Extracted from #6876.
> what is the use case. can't you just remove the previously specified build-dir. The point is to indicate that we do *not* want a build-dir in any case. Otherwise...
``` Building CXX object gui/CMakeFiles/cppcheck-gui.dir/cmake_pch.hxx.pch clang++-20: warning: no such include directory: '/home/runner/work/cppcheck/cppcheck/cmake.output/gui/cppcheck-gui_autogen/include' [-Wmissing-include-dirs] ```
> I don't see how the flag will be used in the pytest files. That was all stated in ma previous comment. > can't we do something in the pytest...
Clang 20 has been branched and the first release candidate is scheduled to be released within the next few days so this can be merged now.
No further feedback in over a month - merging.
> Clang 20 has been branched and the first release candidate is scheduled to be released within the next few days so this can be merged now. The schedule as...
Actually we should wait until `apt.llvm.org` is done with the branching as well. That usually comes with some issues.
Not sure if the TypeSanitizer will be of value for us because it still has false positives - see https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/122470.
@danmar can this be merged? It is not different in principal from the previous change I did in this and it blocks a lot of follow-ups (including prototyping some of...