Oliver Stöneberg

Results 1142 comments of Oliver Stöneberg

#283 possibly needs to be addressed as prerequisite of this as the include directories are currently not differentiated between system and "local" ones.

Not to throw a wrench into this but I think #475 and #524 should land/be fixed before this is being merged. Otherwise things could get quite messy down the road....

> I don't know how much this will actually affect the performance though, maybe it's negligible. After #438 has been merged and I will extend the callgrind step with that...

In #438 I encountered a framework path. I only treat it like a regular include path but after that has been merged we should hook it up properly via the...

I think we should get the MinGW changes into a release first and get it downstream and do an immediately release with these changes. It is already a lot of...

> goal: try to make sure that performance is not affected negatively by this PR if we only provide `-I` flags as before.. I have WIP changes for `selfcheck.sh` which...

> I don't see why a mingw release would be needed first? Since it exposed major bugs - it should have been ported back to 2.18 but there were just...

> I will tag simplecpp now so we can merge simplecpp to cppcheck.. and I feel that if mingw is not added soonish then let's merge this PR without it....

> > well it would be nice with some callgrind scripts > > There already is one but it does not rely on include paths as the additional selfcheck does....