Oliver Stöneberg
Oliver Stöneberg
The flakey test is already being tracked in https://trac.cppcheck.net/ticket/12106.
Still a draft because I have not tested the non-tests scripts yet.
Even without my change `test-my-pr.py` fails for me: ``` $ python3 tools/test-my-pr.py Namespace(j=1, p=256, packages=None, packages_path=None, o='my_check_diff.log', c_only=False, cpp_only=False, work_path='/home/sshuser/cppcheck-test-my-pr-workfolder') using 'make' Checking out main Already on 'main' Your branch...
> I am confused I have run that script now and then. Ludvig executed it last week on the branch where he tries to handle unnamed bitfield members . We...
I also considered moving the `FileLister` but have not looked into it yet. Should probably go into `frontend` instead.
In tests which have precedent we could just use `ScopedFile` instead of converting them into a Python test.
Prerequisite for https://github.com/danmar/simplecpp/pull/585.
Requires #8012 to be merged first.
Thanks for your contribution. I am not in favor of pinning (at least for this project) because it will unnecessary noise (lots of PRs), work (see next point) and might...
Also bumping a lot of different versions of multiple modules in a single merge is also not great since it makes it harder to bisect potential issues later on and...