Wei
@SoonIter accidentally discovered a bug (or within expectations), Rslib's documentation is break on main HEAD.
@nyqykk Let’s keep pushing this PR.
Generally LGTM. 👍
Append `examples/module-fedration/mf-react-component` to https://github.com/web-infra-dev/rslib/blob/main/tests/benchmark/index.bench.ts then we're good to merge. You could remove the `'esm'` and `'cjs'` lib from the config like what `disableDts` does. This could help us only foucs...
The benchmark shows `examples/react-component-bundle-false` got improved, but it should be irrelevant. cc @SoonIter any idea?
Great work!
Currently, entry module is required to be concatenated, eval will break the premise.
- `__WEBPACK_EXTERNAL_MODULE_` is a known issue that will break the readability of the output files, also see __WEBPACK_EXTERNAL_MODULE_. - Could you specify the issue with `__webpack_exports__`? I think it's about...
Well, technically it's not a bug as even in this format it keeps the same semantic as the expected one, and tree shaking also performs normally. But it's terrible for...
The output style is defined by webpack / Rspack internal mechanism, but we should tweak it for Rslib.