Field G. Van Zee

Results 177 comments of Field G. Van Zee

@sgsokol Okay, give 16b5591 a try. Thanks for your patience.

@sgsokol Our goal is to obviate `libf2c`. We do not want libflame to need it. My understanding was that this was feasible, so long as libflame provided all of the...

@sgsokol I have found an implementation of `libf2c` [1]. I will try to import just the components needed in order to satisfy the symbols in libflame. (Hopefully this is not...

@sgsokol I managed to make progress with linking the libflame testsuite driver to `libflame.so`. We are down to just three missing symbols: ``` /u/field/flame/lib/libflame.so: undefined reference to `do_lio' /u/field/flame/lib/libflame.so: undefined...

@sgsokol I can now successfully link the test suite to `libflame.so`. Try 3bc0286 and let me know how it goes. (Note that you should no longer need `-lf2c`, nor do...

@sgsokol First, sorry for the long delay. I composed a reply and forgot to send it! :( That reply is below. Glad we finally got it working. Thanks for your...

@akesandgren Thanks for this report, but it's not really clear to me how to go about trying to reproduce. Could you provide some details in that regard?

Sorry for the delay in looking at this, @JerryMaoQC. I do aim to get to it soon.

@JerryMaoQC I noticed you chose the sandbox name `gemmd`. However, your operation is still called `gemm` (with APIs via `bls_gemm()`, `bls_gemm_ex()`, `bls_?gemm()`). Was this name (and the API names) chosen...

@devinamatthews I suggested that @JerryMaoQC could submit it since there is no harm (that I could see) in having the extra sandbox directory there for posterity and in case others...