Field G. Van Zee
Field G. Van Zee
Thanks @xrq-phys! (@jdiamondGitHub will definitely be interested in this.) > Shall I test out `gemmtrsm`? You are welcome to give it a try! It would have a great benefit for...
(Apologies @xrq-phys and @figual for the earlier (deleted) message: I got my PRs mixed up.)
Closing this PR. With the merging of #655, it is now moot. Thanks @xrq-phys!
A few comments. 1. We don't typically advocate for honoring a `trans_t` parameter on the output matrix. 2. This code leaves out the setting of `alpha` and `beta` (and other...
Thanks for your input Jeff. I'll start thinking seriously about how best to accommodate your application's needs. So far, I'm partial to using proper error return codes from user-level functions,...
I think I've come up with a feasible plan to overhaul the way errors are handled that will both preserve the status quo (as an option) as well as provide...
> There's not really any pre-defined macro in that list that gives an idea what OS it is/will be running on. @fgvanzee for builds with `--disable-system` maybe `bli_system.h` should instead...
@devinamatthews Take a look at my modifications to `bli_system.h`. Do you see anything wrong with it? Three of our four [AppVeyor builds](https://ci.appveyor.com/project/shpc/blis/history) are failing now.
Oh, maybe I need to re-express the conditional in terms of `BLIS_DISABLE_SYSTEM`. I'll check.
So, turns out that's fine. This is from `bli_config.h.in`: ```c #if @enable_system@ #define BLIS_ENABLE_SYSTEM #else #define BLIS_DISABLE_SYSTEM #endif ```