Frank Filz

Results 698 comments of Frank Filz

> I tried the new patch, the bug seems to be fixed, memory of ganesha is stable. Thanks for the verification.

I don't think the patch is a good way to solve the issue. Is this still a problem and if so, can we find another solution?

There may be a reasonable request here, tagging as enhancement.

The BUG is we need a better log message. The DOCUMENTATION is we need to document that symlinks aren't allowed in the path specified by Path=.

I think the problem is that Ganesha opens a socket for each protocol (NFS, MOUNT, NLM, etc.). Only one socket can bind to a particular port. We COULD detect the...

We probably should check for failure... It wouldn't be too hard to do that.

No fsynced data would be lost exactly since that isn't dependent on state recovery. What could be lost is byte range locks, so if a client was in the middle...