Florian Festi
Florian Festi
An alternative implementation to #3036
OK, the _target_cpu issue is now papered over and debuginfo is enabled through the whole test suite. This should ow all works as expected (with the exception of the --build-in_place...
This is superseded by #3085 which solves is similarly but even a bit cleaner.
LGTM but Michal is more familiar with the CI stuff.
The issue here is that we actually want some macros in the SPEC file. I wonder if we could just add `%__spec_pre` and `%__spec_post` macros that are expanded at the...
OK, I guess I start with writing down how debuginfo works right now: There are quite a few macros that [control](https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/blob/master/macros.in#L452) and [implement](https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/blob/master/macros.in#L135) the debuginfo creation. The macro starting the...
Yeah, but that is the hard part - especially if we want to keep the debuginfo packages as a macro template. Ofc we could just create those packages in C....
Well, guess the easiest way to do this is to get #1485 merged and use that. All it takes it looking at the results of the `find_debuginfo` run and write...
Yes, but creating them from C seems like a step in the wrong direction especially when hard coding the details like Summary and Description.
Looks like this didn't get closed although the patch is already upstream for quite a while. Closing now.