Celso Fernandes

I'm facing a similar problem... I'm gonna simplify my use case... I'm building a web interface to a 3rd party API, and I hit the API and get the available...

so changing the disposable hash would be a better way then creating a class in runtime, right? any example? :kissing_heart:

@apotonick today I checked the should-matchers deeper than yesterday and yes, it runs validations I think in this case we need to think should-matchers port not as a silver bullet,...

@zavan is this way of using shoulda matchers is still working with reform 2.0 and latest trailblazer? I'm getting a wrong number of arguments (0 for 1) on reform-1.2.6/lib/reform/contract/setup.rb:4 ps:...

as I've checked: [shoulda uniqueness matcher](https://github.com/thoughtbot/shoulda-matchers/blob/master/lib/shoulda/matchers/active_record/validate_uniqueness_of_matcher.rb#L258) instantiates a new model using Model.new and [setup](https://github.com/apotonick/reform/blob/master/lib/reform/contract/setup.rb#L4) needs the model as parameter ps: I tested with presence matcher and worked fine FYI, for...

oh, now I double checked with rails implementation, it's supposed to be `:"variants[0].display_name"` the id in the keys name, not an array, I'm gonna fix this

for reference [erector](https://github.com/erector/erector) and [arbre](http://github.com/activeadmin/arbre) Thats a fuckin' amazing idea... specially because we can "overwrite" and customize views (manually or programmatically) using ruby OOP trying to go one step further...

Hi @stefants thanks for the PR... could you please point to the documentation where's this method? I tried to find and couldn't. Thank you

@stefants hey! 28 days... shame on me! sorry about taking so long on this! after the review we are good to merge 😎 thank you! 🙇

@stefants great! 1. are you going to make the changes on review? 2. would you like to open an issue to discuss _new stuff_? heheh