Felipe Corrêa da Silva Sanches

sounds good

Since I merged #453, we will now need to migrate this PR to https://github.com/googlefonts/glyphsets/

I'd like to take a look at this soon

since I merged #453, we will now need to migrate this PR to https://github.com/googlefonts/glyphsets/

@davelab6 / @RosaWagner can any of you migrate this issue to the **google/fonts** issue tracker? (I do not seem to have the rights to do so)

@moontypespace has provided a new FontBakery check related to this discussion at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/pull/3545 If we ever consider this a generic check, then we should consider incorporating it on FontBakery's 'universal'...

I believe the code was already migrated, but we still mention the dependency on README.md and also have it commented out on `requirements.txt` So, I think there are the last...

"GF Latin core glyph list" is currently included in `fontbakery.constants` exactly because we did not want to include the entire gftools as a dependency

sounds good!

I've just solved a significant part of this puzzle! ---- Now all glyphset info is separated in a new reusable python module called `glyphsets` available at: * https://github.com/googlefonts/glyphsets * https://pypi.org/project/glyphsets/...