Reef Turner

@michaelDCurran Could you assess this for priority please? This is not a regression, and affects the object model in word (which NVDA is moving away from). I'd suggest P3.

>f that's completely unrelated, I think you can ignore it. There has been issues with Chrome and system tests in the past. @feerrenrut could you confirm this? Yes, occasionally the...

>I wonder whether this change justifies a restructure of the dialog that changes debug logging and add-ons disabled to check boxes. I'd be cautious about this. This is quite developer-centric....

After thinking about this for a while, my preference would be to: - Add a "restart NVDA in safe mode" (combining the "with debug logging" and "with addons disabled") to...

@lukaszgo1 Thanks for taking time to describe your concerns here, at this point I'm not convinced adding more developer options to this dialog is in the best interest of NVDA....

Another thing to consider for the use-case of a core or add-on developer asking a user to restart with specific debug options, `nvda+q` may not work if they have set...

>That depends on the definition of the developer-centric - for me if the option can be used by the end user- even only when requested by the developer we cannot...

Can you confirm that the actual behavior is NVDA reporting: ``` Link A Link B Link C ``` This might be related to the `role="presentation"` in the top level `table`...

There was some work done recently in this area, see #13039, it might be worth testing the latest NVDA alpha: https://www.nvaccess.org/files/nvda/snapshots/

Please ensure that you test with how this affects the reporting of "indeterminate progress bars" which may use the same state, but a different role. We don't want them to...