petnet-feeder-service icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
petnet-feeder-service copied to clipboard

Bump pytest-mock from 3.7.0 to 3.8.2

Open dependabot[bot] opened this issue 3 years ago • 1 comments

Bumps pytest-mock from 3.7.0 to 3.8.2.

Release notes

Sourced from pytest-mock's releases.

v3.8.2

3.8.2 (2022-07-05)

  • Fixed AsyncMock support for Python 3.7+ in mocker.async_stub (#302).

v3.8.1

Releases

3.8.1 (2022-06-24)

  • Fix regression caused by an explicit mock dependency in the code (#298).

3.8.0 (2022-06-24)

3.7.0 (2022-01-28)

  • Python 3.10 now officially supported.
  • Dropped support for Python 3.6.

3.6.1 (2021-05-06)

3.6.0 (2021-04-24)

  • pytest-mock no longer supports Python 3.5.
  • Correct type annotations for mocker.patch.object to also include the string form. Thanks @​plannigan for the PR (#235).
  • reset_all now supports return_value and side_effect keyword arguments. Thanks @​alex-marty for the PR (#214).

3.5.1 (2021-01-10)

  • Use inspect.getattr_static instead of resorting to object.__getattribute__ magic. This should better comply with objects which implement a custom descriptor protocol. Thanks @​yesthesoup for the PR (#224).

3.5.0 (2021-01-04)

  • Now all patch functions will emit a warning instead of raising a ValueError when used

... (truncated)

Changelog

Sourced from pytest-mock's changelog.

3.8.2 (2022-07-05)

  • Fixed AsyncMock support for Python 3.7+ in mocker.async_stub ([#302](https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/issues/302)_).

.. _#302: pytest-dev/pytest-mock#302

3.8.1 (2022-06-24)

  • Fixed regression caused by an explicit mock dependency in the code ([#298](https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/issues/298)_).

.. _#298: pytest-dev/pytest-mock#298

3.8.0 (2022-06-24)

  • Add MockerFixture.async_mock method. Thanks @PerchunPak_ for the PR ([#296](https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/issues/296)_).

.. _@​PerchunPak: https://github.com/PerchunPak .. _#296: pytest-dev/pytest-mock#296

Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

dependabot[bot] avatar Jul 05 '22 13:07 dependabot[bot]

Codecov Report

Base: 99.05% // Head: 99.05% // No change to project coverage :thumbsup:

Coverage data is based on head (36f9af5) compared to base (20e08b5). Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #244   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.05%   99.05%           
=======================================
  Files          18       18           
  Lines         955      955           
  Branches      133      133           
=======================================
  Hits          946      946           
  Misses          9        9           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 99.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

codecov[bot] avatar Jul 05 '22 13:07 codecov[bot]

@dependabot rebase

tedder avatar Sep 14 '22 17:09 tedder