It seems that some F33 packages does not have proper status

[voxik]

Looking at rubygem-actioncable and possibly several other packages from the same update, it seems they don't have proper status for F33. Could it be caused by merging side tag, where there were some issues?

[mizdebsk]

I've established as follows:

• In Koschei collection f33 package rubygem-actioncable is marked as "unresolved" with dependency problem: No package found for: rubygem(actionpack) = 5.2.3
• the lastest SRPM of rubygem-actioncable in f33-build Koji tag is rubygem-actioncable-6.0.3.1-1.fc33.src
• the SRPM does not have BuildRequires on rubygem(actionpack) = 5.2.3, it requires rubygem(actionpack) = 6.0.3.1
• the latest version-release known by Koschei is 5.2.3-4.fc33:

koschei=> select p.id, version, release from build b join package p on b.id=p.last_complete_build_id join collection c on c.id=p.collection_id where p.name='rubygem-actioncable' and c.name='f33';
   id   | version | release 
--------+---------+---------
 324641 | 5.2.3   | 4.fc33
(1 row)

• Koschei knows about the 6.0.3.1-1.fc33 build, but it does not consider it latest:

koschei=> select id, version, release, real, started, last_complete from build where package_id=324641 ;
   id    | version | release | real |          started           | last_complete 
---------+---------+---------+------+----------------------------+---------------
 8838928 | 5.2.3   | 4.fc33  | f    | 2020-08-16 22:06:38.991268 | t
 8808192 | 5.2.3   | 4.fc33  | f    | 2020-08-09 12:58:14.845246 | f
 8846684 | 6.0.3.1 | 1.fc33  | t    | 2020-08-07 08:42:13.565842 | f
 8790281 | 5.2.3   | 4.fc33  | f    | 2020-08-02 17:40:47.1889   | f
 8763260 | 5.2.3   | 3.fc32  | f    | 2020-07-31 19:29:23.618542 | f
 8773970 | 5.2.3   | 4.fc33  | t    | 2020-07-29 06:04:31.691981 | f
 8748062 | 5.2.3   | 3.fc32  | f    | 2020-07-23 21:34:25.642138 | f
(7 rows)

• the latest complete build is scratch build.

I suspect that Koschei is using last complete build, possibly scratch build, to determine latest SRPM version, while it should consider only non-scratch builds. I will continue the investigation later.

[voxik]

I think we have similar issue on F34 now:

https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/rubygem-activemodel?collection=f34

After merge of this side tag:

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-83a4999b7c