Daniel Farina
Daniel Farina
Yeah, I suppose we should, sadface
I agree, it needs to be adaptive, we don't have the wherewithal for supervision.
No I’m just not reading carefully enough/forgot the context. Forget what I said. On Thu, Nov 6, 2025 at 6:57 AM Jeremy Evans ***@***.***> wrote: > *jeremyevans* left a comment...
I have a general question, that may be answerable by carefully going through the patch, but I thought I'd ask at a high level to get your thoughts. I think...
> @pykello - after a discussion around @byucesoy change for billing rates, it might be better to rename all cpu_* fields to vcpu_* to keep it consistent with the general...
We could probably add the historical reason to the commit message. Here's a proposal (feel encouraged to edit it): > Originally designed in 2023 (9eb482b3395e6aa3e429882816e14fd0294231b2), billing records were created only...
> I have a branch for continues push 😀 Not created a PR yet. I'm finishing tests for it :exploding_head:
Huh this patch is from february and the feedback was positive, was there a reason it didn't make it? @jeremyevans @jeremyevans @furkansahin [maybe the reason was me, but I don't...
Oh I see, I thought you were editing the other increment. This one will injure chances of exiting promptly though, for any number of reasons (update can block quite a...