No license present
Howdy,
Thanks for the project.
I notice there's no license included. Would you mind adding one, please? If you were to ask me which I'd like, I'd answer Apache 2.0 https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.
BR
hi,
sorry totally missed the notification for this. Do you want a license on the RPM spec files or do you want the licenses of the various projects being built in here?
I'm interested in a LICENSE file at the top of this repository that states under which license I may use the .spec files that you created here.
The bcc and bpftrace specs are based on those from fedora so I'd say its whatever license they use for the specfiles, which seems to be MIT: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main . The others are trivial but MIT license should be fine on those too