Fawad Khaliq

@jlbutler absolutely! That'd be great if you can help with it. thanks!

@jlbutler assigning the issue to you since you'll be working on it

Looking at the PR description, it's hard to figure the context behind this change, how this impacts users, upgrades, downgrades, what testing was done, what documentation impact this has. Can...

`-qps 0` results very similar to found here https://fortio.istio.io/browse?url=2018-01-30-004149_No_istio_1M_max_qps.json ``` kubectl exec $FORTIO_POD -- fortio load -quiet -qps 0 -t 30s -c 48 -r 0.0001 http://lwan:8080 Fortio 0.6.9 running at...

Yes, changing the number of connections fixes it. I was trying to see the difference between istio latency numbers between our setups and difference in number of connections (fortio.istio vs...

> I think the more hot a system runs the lower the latency gets, up to the best case, after which it degrades - is that what you observe ?...

I agree. There are too many variables here. Just by giving more resources to the system, the problem goes away. Thanks! It would be good to have some params that...

> can you summarize a repro of that problem ? at low enough qps the default k8s 0.9 vcpu should be plenty for fortio itself I rephrased my comment :)...

Tried with 1 minute. Same results. 4 iterations for each qps: 400, 500 and here are the results of p99.9.

Sorry I totally missed these notifications. Let me collect them and get back to you.