fantasai
fantasai
@dholbert Mark Commenter Satisfied if you're happy with it, re-open if not!
Mm, actually we have a fair amount of interop here. Test results **for a statically-positioned abspos child of a flex container**: * Neither Firefox nor Chrome applies justify-self to an...
OK, so proposal: define the static position rectangle of a flex child as: - In the main axis, the start and end margin edges of the child if it were...
Related issue: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5061
So the question we need an answer to is, would swapping the axes of align-self vs justify-self on an abspos child of a column flex container (i.e. making align/justify match...
@foolip See https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5843#issuecomment-757021088
@davidsgrogan Hm, that's a separate question I think. So I guess we have two questions: * For an abspos child of a flex container, would causing `align-self` and `justify-self` to...
@bfgeek The ideal behavior would be to ignore `align-content` and `justify-content`, yes. Just like in Grid. That would allow the `align-self` and `justify-self` to consistently control alignment on absolutely-positioned descendants...
@tabatkins and I think some of the confusion here comes from missing a small nuance in this paragraph: > The content-based minimum size of a flex item is the smaller...
Propose to close as editorial / invalid. Please let us know if we need to consider anything else!