fanquake
fanquake
Concept ACK
> and would like the review standard to be lower for documentation and CI changes that can benefit from faster iteration. Couldn't this be done without changing anything else? Non...
@marcofleon you might be interested in reviewing here?
@luke-jr are you going to followup with the questions, test suggestions, code-review and general feedback here?
Discussed this with some other contributors, and for now, I'm removing this from the 25.1 milestone. I don't currently consider this a blocker for 25.1, and, it cannot be merged...
> I could take this forward if there's no progress here. I don't think it's clear that is something that actually needs fixing, or that we want to change at...
Closing, given no followup.
I tried Guix building this branch: ```bash HOSTS="x86_64-linux-gnu" ./contrib/guix/guix-build Consolidate compiler generated dependencies of target bitcoin-qt [100%] Built target bitcoin-qt Checking binary security... /distsrc-base/distsrc-0b503d792f0b-x86_64-linux-gnu/build/src/bitcoin: failed FORTIFY make[3]: *** [CMakeFiles/check-security.dir/build.make:71: CMakeFiles/check-security]...
Looks like this is at least missing link options like `-compatibility_version 5.0.0 -current_version 5.1.0`.