François Armand
François Armand
OK, merging this PR
Thanks, I worked around the problem by adding the two entries with mod request once the server is up as it wasn't important to have them at load time (it's...
Things diverged too much, and the draft seems abandoned, so I'm closing it
Ah. This is exactly my wondering, to. I believe that as an user (ie I don't know it it's possible), what I want is: - my type O is what...
Well, what I know is that in classical for { } yield { }, I'm accustomed to normalise to Xor[E, T]. So I want to make the really common use...
OK, what about if calculus returns a `Xor[E, List[D]]`? (because of course, you're right, the problem in my use case is in the last returned type...)
@mandubian > yep that' s the case I was speaking about... the important isn't only the O but what you want to keep in your Xor[E, List[D]]... > > Xor[E,...
Is it simpler if onionN[O, 1] consume the full stack and then drop one layer ? (no because it's the most external layer which is easely dropped ?)
the input
oOOHHHhhoo. What a lib dev has to do to let the user think things are nice :))