libs
libs copied to clipboard
update(sinsp/ifinfo): add new public addr_to_string methods
What type of PR is this?
Uncomment one (or more)
/kind <>lines:
/kind bug
/kind cleanup
/kind design
/kind documentation
/kind failing-test
/kind feature
Any specific area of the project related to this PR?
Uncomment one (or more)
/area <>lines:
/area API-version
/area build
/area CI
/area driver-kmod
/area driver-bpf
/area driver-modern-bpf
/area libscap-engine-bpf
/area libscap-engine-gvisor
/area libscap-engine-kmod
/area libscap-engine-modern-bpf
/area libscap-engine-nodriver
/area libscap-engine-noop
/area libscap-engine-source-plugin
/area libscap-engine-savefile
/area libscap
/area libpman
/area libsinsp
/area tests
/area proposals
Does this PR require a change in the driver versions?
/version driver-API-version-major
/version driver-API-version-minor
/version driver-API-version-patch
/version driver-SCHEMA-version-major
/version driver-SCHEMA-version-minor
/version driver-SCHEMA-version-patch
What this PR does / why we need it:
Expose proper / public ip4 and ip6 ip addr to string conversion methods, see https://github.com/falcosecurity/falco/pull/3253/files#r1651554317 @sgaist and @FedeDP
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:
NONE
/milestone 0.18.0
Perf diff from master - unit tests
4.41% +1.89% [.] sinsp_thread_manager::find_thread
7.65% -1.21% [.] sinsp::next
4.25% -1.09% [.] sinsp_evt::load_params
0.11% +0.96% [.] scap_event_has_large_payload
1.62% -0.92% [.] sinsp_parser::event_cleanup
3.45% +0.91% [.] sinsp_parser::process_event
4.18% -0.88% [.] sinsp_thread_manager::get_thread_ref
10.07% +0.85% [.] sinsp_parser::reset
1.40% +0.70% [.] std::_Hashtable<long, std::pair<long const, std::shared_ptr<sinsp_threadinfo> >, std::allocator<std::pair<long const, std::shared_ptr<sinsp_threadinfo> > >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_to<long>, std::hash<long>, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__detail::_Hashtable_traits<false, false, true> >::_M_find_before_node
1.40% -0.53% [.] sinsp_evt::get_ts
Perf diff from master - scap file
12.52% -5.75% [.] sinsp_thread_manager::get_thread_ref
19.52% -4.87% [.] sinsp_filter_check::extract_nocache
6.43% +4.87% [.] sinsp_evt_formatter::tostring_withformat
3.19% +4.31% [.] std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct<char const*>
3.27% +2.98% [.] sinsp_filter_check_event::extract_single
9.71% -2.45% [.] sinsp_filter_check::apply_transformers
6.56% -2.23% [.] std::_Hashtable<long, std::pair<long const, std::shared_ptr<sinsp_threadinfo> >, std::allocator<std::pair<long const, std::shared_ptr<sinsp_threadinfo> > >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_to<long>, std::hash<long>, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__detail::_Hashtable_traits<false, false, true> >::_M_find_before_node
3.28% +1.35% [.] sinsp_filter_check::rawval_to_string
9.78% +0.95% [.] sinsp_filter_check::tostring
3.27% +0.44% [.] sinsp_evt::get_param_as_str
Heap diff from master - unit tests
total runtime: 0.04s.
calls to allocation functions: -695 (-18783/s)
temporary memory allocations: -207 (-5594/s)
peak heap memory consumption: -800B
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 0B
total memory leaked: 0B
Heap diff from master - scap file
total runtime: -0.00s.
calls to allocation functions: 0 (0/s)
temporary memory allocations: 4 (-4000/s)
peak heap memory consumption: 0B
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 0B
total memory leaked: 0B
LGTM label has been added.
Rebased as the CI never triggered. What is needed to finish this PR? Thanks!
Perf diff from master - unit tests
6.63% +1.04% [.] sinsp::next
5.41% -0.87% [.] next
1.44% -0.57% [.] 0x00000000000e83b0
0.84% +0.55% [.] sinsp_evt::get_ts
0.37% +0.54% [.] scap_event_has_large_payload
4.70% +0.52% [.] sinsp_evt::get_type
0.83% -0.52% [.] sinsp_fdtable::find_ref
1.10% -0.51% [.] sinsp_evt::get_direction
1.92% -0.49% [.] std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct<char const*>
0.73% +0.45% [.] std::_Hashtable<long, std::pair<long const, std::shared_ptr<sinsp_threadinfo> >, std::allocator<std::pair<long const, std::shared_ptr<sinsp_threadinfo> > >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_to<long>, std::hash<long>, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__detail::_Hashtable_traits<false, false, true> >::find
Perf diff from master - scap file
15.12% -9.53% [.] sinsp_evt_formatter::tostring_withformat
8.58% -4.47% [.] sinsp_filter_check_thread::extract_single
8.23% -4.23% [.] 0x00000000000a77e0
4.32% +3.39% [.] std::_Hashtable<long, std::pair<long const, std::shared_ptr<sinsp_threadinfo> >, std::allocator<std::pair<long const, std::shared_ptr<sinsp_threadinfo> > >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_to<long>, std::hash<long>, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__detail::_Hashtable_traits<false, false, true> >::_M_find_before_node
6.45% -2.83% [.] sinsp_filter_check::tostring
4.30% +2.62% [.] sinsp_thread_manager::find_thread
2.10% +2.22% [.] sinsp_thread_manager::get_thread_ref
6.37% +1.37% [.] gzfile_read
6.42% +1.33% [.] sinsp_filter_check::extract_nocache
4.22% -1.23% [.] sinsp_filter_check::get_transformed_field_info
Heap diff from master - unit tests
total runtime: 0.05s.
calls to allocation functions: -808 (-15843/s)
temporary memory allocations: -310 (-6078/s)
peak heap memory consumption: -800B
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 0B
total memory leaked: 0B
Heap diff from master - scap file
total runtime: -0.00s.
calls to allocation functions: 0 (0/s)
temporary memory allocations: -9 (2250/s)
peak heap memory consumption: 0B
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 0B
total memory leaked: 0B
LGTM label has been added.
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED
This pull-request has been approved by: FedeDP, incertum
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
The pull request process is described here
- ~~OWNERS~~ [FedeDP,incertum]
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment
Would there be feedback from the second reviewer? Thanks.