faker
faker copied to clipboard
Add new notations module for science
Clear and concise description of the problem
Add notations module to science so that we could use symbol to express units in science
Suggested solution
According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_common_physics_notations
Alternative
No response
Additional context
No response
Thank you for your feature proposal.
We marked it as "waiting for user interest" for now to gather some feedback from our community:
- If you would like to see this feature be implemented, please react to the description with an up-vote (:+1:).
- If you have a suggestion or want to point out some special cases that need to be considered, please leave a comment, so we are aware about them.
We would also like to hear about other community members' use cases for the feature to give us a better understanding of their potential implicit or explicit requirements.
We will start the implementation based on:
- the number of votes (:+1:) and comments
- the relevance for the ecosystem
- availability of alternatives and workarounds
- and the complexity of the requested feature
We do this because:
- There are plenty of languages/countries out there and we would like to ensure that every method can cover all or almost all of them.
- Every feature we add to faker has "costs" associated to it:
- initial costs: design, implementation, reviews, documentation
- running costs: awareness of the feature itself, more complex module structure, increased bundle size, more work during refactors
What is the difference between this and faker.science.unit?
@ST-DDT
In science, unit is used to mean possessed by a physical quantity. notations is used to mean code of physical unit.
For example, The formula of pressure is P = F / S. The P means pressure, F means force and S means square. Both they are notations instead of units.
Anyway, the unit of F is Newton, P is Pascal, S can use meter, centmeter, kilometer and etc.
i would call things like force, pressure, area "quantities" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_quantity - the notation is just the symbol.
export interface Notation {
/**
* The long version of the notations (e.g. `work`).
*/
name: string;
/**
* The short version/abbreviation of the notations (e.g. `w`)
*/
symbol: string;
}
However, one notation can refer to more than one meaning.( e.g. uppercase C can refer capacitance, heat capacity and constant of integration ) I don't think this interface is good. Could you tell me how I modify it?😊
@matthewmayer
I would wait for more upvotes. One of the reason to wait for 10+ upvotes is to get a variety of opinions over what use cases people might need this for. That informs making sensible naming decisions.
I don't use the science module in any of my projects, but if we can find 10 people who do over a few months, they'd have a much better idea of how to structure the api.
i would call things like force, pressure, area "quantities" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_quantity - the notation is just the symbol.
I agree with this--- "notation" is too similar to "unit", so if we implement it, we should name this method "quantity".