Low quality results compared to Huggingface spaces and Demo!

[arash-aut]

Hello everyone, I tried to test the reported results on Google Colab, but when I compared the results with Huggingface space using the same inputs, it appeared that there is a wide gap between them! I also, turned "ngram-filtering" to True but it changed nothing! Here is the link to my experiment: link

I would be grateful if anyone can help me reach the performances of Huggingface spaces or Demo.

Thank you!

[RohitMidha23]

can you make your notebook public and accessible?

[cndn]

Could you compare your implementation with HF demo around https://huggingface.co/spaces/facebook/seamless_m4t/blob/main/app.py#L78? Note that resampling might be needed.

[arash-aut]

Hi Ning, Thank you for your responce! I think the problem is solved. I'm getting the same result as Huggingface space and Demo NOW! @cndn

[pp268]

Could you compare your implementation with HF demo around https://huggingface.co/spaces/facebook/seamless_m4t/blob/main/app.py#L78? Note that resampling might be needed.

I am getting same low quality results compared to huggingface demo. When I resampled it to 16KHz same as mentioned in repo and also in huggingface app.py. I am getting error that it needed sample rate of 44100 instead of 16000