Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
@alan-francis @avelino seems it's somehow related to #520 no?
@microo8 would be nice if you share some code sample
I'm thinking about we have a way to manage clusters without need to set 'pgvm use' first... we must put the PostgreSQL version at the beginning of cluster name to...
You need to check the PostgreSQL version because the "application_name" was introduced in 9.0 version.
> What about upgrade/downgrade tests? I don't know yet what happened, but in any case it will be material for another PR.
As per discussed in pvt with @gayyappan this PR lack of some important validations: 1. bucket width of the nested cagg should be multiple of the parent cagg bucket width...
> Hi, PostgreSQL 15 is in Beta 3 already, any news on when TimescaleDB will be compatible? We're [working on this already](https://github.com/timescale/timescaledb/pulls?q=is%3Apr+label%3Apg15+is%3Aclosed) and trying our best to make it available...
@mirandaauhl the `time_bucket_ng` function is not supported for time bucket chunk exclusion. And now the [`time_bucket_ng` is DEPRECATED](https://docs.timescale.com/api/latest/hyperfunctions/time_bucket_ng/) so I strong recommend you to upgrade to 2.8.1 and use `time_bucket`...
In [2.13.0](https://github.com/timescale/timescaledb/releases/tag/2.13.0) we announced the deprecation of multi-node and it will be complete removed from the upcoming 2.14.0.
In [2.13.0](https://github.com/timescale/timescaledb/releases/tag/2.13.0) we announced the deprecation of multi-node and it will be complete removed from the upcoming 2.14.0.