fabian18
fabian18
> Is that with the current master? master 1638606c5c01b24d967e5630fa43efad5437add9 You have to send the request multiple times. Your last comment shows only `2.01` Created.
and with current `master` branch, yes
yes on stm32
> can you try with https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/18227 `CFLAGS+=-DCONFIG_GNRC_PKTBUF_CHECK_USE_AFTER_FREE=1` makes no difference, the same assertion is triggered.
Good news: With #18416 no assertion fires anymore, and it is functioning very well. But still, on the second attempt to upload a file, some blocks are transmitted twice immediately....
> so can we close this now? I would keep it open, because it is only partially fixed.
Now that `ztimer64` is there, should I add `MODULE_ZTIMER64_NSEC` in this PR or should it be another PR?
> anyone who would finally implement RFC 3971 (which would be possible even for 6Lo-ND with RFC 8505 as far as I understand), would otherwise face a huge WTF. That´s...
@fjmolinas could be interested
The first thing I asked myself, was whether `_event_cb` and `_event_ctx` should be protected in some way by a mutex or atomic accesses because they are `static` variables and are...