Fabian Hiller

My goal is to finalize and merge this PR tomorrow or Tuesday and release these methods with Valibot v1.1 in the next few days. If it takes us longer than...

Don't worry. I will make sure everything is ok before merging. Thank you for updating the PR! I will probably merge it on the weekend and publish it with Valibot...

I started to review this PR and will probably merge it tomorrow. Please don't modify it.

Next, I will review the docs and merge the PR.

[Valibot v1.1.0](https://github.com/fabian-hiller/valibot/releases/tag/v1.1.0) is available!

Thanks for the tip! I think it makes sense, but I need to investigate it further. So the basic idea or problem is that in this case TS is inferring...

I definitely want to improve our types with `NoInfer`, but I'm not sure if we should wait a bit and reschedule it for our v2 release, because with this change...

I am thinking about implementing `NoInfer` while we are in v1 beta and RC, because I think the upgrade from our current required TS version to v5.4 is seamless, and...

My research has shown that `NoInfer` improves DX in your examples, but makes it worse in another. ```ts // This works now const Schema1 = v.pipe(v.number(), v.check(Number.isSafeInteger)); // But this...

I am closing this issue due to inactivity. I welcome feedback if there is still interest in this change for our v2 version.