Standa Lukeš

@darilek I don't know Aurelia at all, so it may be very helpful you would share some experiences. Do you have tips for concrete parts, that I should have a...

@zulq Actually the backward compatibility is the main concern of this issue, so you can be quite sure, that everything will work (in the compatibility mode) even after this change...

Just an idea: it could be cool to write user control in Fable using the virtual dom in a similar way fable-arch works and render it client-side and server-side using...

Ok, I suppose that backward compatibility can be fun, at least sometimes - this was a quite cool weekend project ;) I managed to create a proof-of-concept implementation of the...

## Implementation Status Update I have moved the implementation quite significantly in past few days. It seems to me that majority of the samples should now work (completely on the...

I have looked at some virtual-dom implementation which would be usable in dotvvm. The proof-of-concept is implemented using https://github.com/Matt-Esch/virtual-dom, which is simple, works and I don't have any problems with...

> Do you want to use its server-side rendering? Is it ok for DotVVM to require Node.js? Yes, I'd really like to support server-side rendering of Preact controls, although I...

FYI: I have arraged a weekend planaton for this saturday/sunday with @tomasherceg about dotvvm 3.0, mainly about new control rendering system. If you'd be interested to participate (physically, a call...