Ellie Hermaszewska

@Joshua-Ashton is this good to merge?

FWIW in terms of "testing", I've been using this since april without issue.

@flibitijibibo It looks as though it would fit in with the API @Joshua-Ashton proposed there. As long as nothing *requires* getting a window or monitor then it's all fine. `CreateSurface`...

No problem by me

After a cursory look, it seems that `GCCDownstreamCompilerUtil::parseOutput`, hence `CommandLineDownstreamCompiler::compile` fails. The error is converted to a nullptr return by `TargetProgram::_createWholeProgramResult` and then ignored by `EndToEndCompileRequest::generateOutput` Because the gcc output...

We should have a `--verbose` option to say what we're calling downstream compilers with, and what their output is.

@marsam github tells me that this PR is a WIP still. Is that correct or is it ok to merge? 

I'd be very happy to merge any patch improving C11 support. I do believe that other specifiers such as nonnull are working though, so maybe alignas would be an easy...

Fixed partially in https://github.com/visq/language-c/pull/77 The user state is broken out into a `MonadState` instance, but not the other features.

I'd happily merge a PR implementing support for these (afaict it's just an alternative to '*' on the syntax). At the least this could be mentioned in the readme. Is...