Amusement Park Improvements. Difference between the call and the error message

[RoelofWobben]

hello

There is a difference between the call and the error message

call :

refute Attendee.new(100).has_pass?

error message :

RuntimeError: Please implement the Attendee#pass? method

[kotp]

We might want to keep the has_pass? from the prior exercise "Amusement Park", instead of changing it to what is generally idiomatic Ruby, which is to say pass?.

[ntijoh-daniel-berg]

Looking at the screenshot in slack, attendee.rb is used, but the tests are looking for amusement_park_improvements.rb The files were recently renamed so that the track dev tests worked for concept exercises.

I created a new account and tried the exercise now, and it gave the web editor the correct file.

A workaround is downloading the files using the cli, then you can move your implementation to the correct file. I'm a newbie when it comes to exercism so there might be a better way though.

[kotp]

This has changed recently, due to issue #1209 which probably should be reverted. I did not notice the (presumably scripted) attempt to name the files the same name as the exercise, which is not necessary. But which is causing some difficulties currently.

[ntijoh-daniel-berg]

The tests now uses the file specified in config.json instead of the exercise slug.

I believe the revert has already happened in #1222

[kytrinyx]

This has been fixed. Closing.