Concept: JSON Decoders

[jiegillet]

Design

Goal

The Goal is to learn to use the Json.Decode and Json.Encode modules.

Learning objectives

Students should be able to

• encode any JSON Value (Json.Encode.object, list and other primitives)
• prettify a value (encode)
• understand why decoders are useful even though the concept is unusual
• decode JSON primitives (bool, int, string...)
• decode data structures (list, dict, nullable)
• decode objects (field, at)
• deal with uncertainty (maybe, oneOf)
• modify and chain decoders (map, andThen, succeed)
• test a decoder on a string input (decodeString)

Out of scope

• encoder aliases (array, set)
• more niche decoders (array, keyValuePairs, oneOrMore, index, null, value)
• dealing with Error and fail
• decoding recursive structures (lazy, a quick mention is fine)

Concepts

The concept this exercise unlocks is:

• json

Prerequisites

• strings
• lists
• dict
• records
• maybe
• custom-types (?)

Analyzer

TBD depending on the exercise

---

Comments

• Would be nice to implement rest-api first to have one practice exercise
• link: https://guide.elm-lang.org/effects/json.html

[jiegillet]

@ceddlyburge related to our discussion on #621, I went through the exercises that we don't have implemented yet (bin/configlet info) to look for other exercises that we could use to practice JSON decoding, but hopefully a bit simpler than rest-api.

Basically no other is meant to practice JSON, so we would have to stretch some scopes.

I found two that may be interesting: pov and zipper. Those two exercises involve trees, pov is bout rerooting trees and zipper traversing trees. I say that they are interesting because parsing trees is fun, all the other exercises have very standard, predictable inputs. Unfortunately, these 2 are not really easy, so it doesn't help us that much.

If we are OK with very simple decoding, maybe we could use affine-cipher.

Best for last: bank-account could work as well, transforming the string instructions into meaningful types.

What do you think?

[ceddlyburge]

I think the api concept is still good, its just that it is complicated, and the instructions are not as clear as they might be (especially for Elm I think).

Maybe we could jump on a call sometime and discuss how to make it clear what the student is supposed to do?

[jiegillet]

Oh I still intend to keep rest-api, and I don't think having a difficult exercise is inherently a problem (I love those as a student), I'm just looking for another one that could help practicing decoders. I don't think that rest-api is THAT complicated to understand if you read the description and the tests carefully though (I'll still try to make it clearer).

[ceddlyburge]

Hmmm, none of those look that good. Maybe we could create a new exercise. Json encoding / decoding is something that people do find confusing when starting Elm, so it is a good idea. Maybe encoding a request to the github api (which is well known), and decoding a response?

[jiegillet]

Creating a proper new practice exercise is way more work than I'm willing to do! I guess we'll need a really good concept exercise :)

[mpizenberg]

Maybe encoding a request to the github api (which is well known), and decoding a response?

Good idea to work on a concrete real-life thing. We'd have to rebuild the JS Value ourselves directly in the test though as obviously there is no outside world access in tests file.