Ewout Kramer

There is an extension produced by the tooling (https://hl7.org/fhir/r4/valueset-codesystem-content-mode.html) that indicates whether a valueset is complete. See also here: https://github.com/FirelyTeam/firely-net-sdk/discussions/2229 We should probably use a valueset to validate a code...

## Problem Although the validator and FhirPath engine are built on top of `ITypedElement`, they both don't need all methods and properties in that interface. On the other hand, both...

Validator: validate that no two constraints should have the same id

2

source is this discussion: https://jira.hl7.org/browse/FHIR-37692

Check whether conditionals use different types in branches

1

We should catch this common error and report it. See also: https://jira.hl7.org/browse/FHIR-42731

**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** We have created a new MimeTypeTerminologyService that you can use (in combination with a MultiTerminologyService) to validate bcp-13. However, our...

The `if-match` header is now also defined on DELETE interactions.

1

https://firely.atlassian.net/browse/VONK-5627 https://jira.hl7.org/browse/FHIR-40772

Profile the performance of the Luhn calculation in FhirPath

1

US Core Organization now contains a FHIRPath statement that does a Luhn check on an Identifier, see us-core-17 here: https://www.hl7.org/fhir/us/core/StructureDefinition-us-core-organization.html This historically triggered a deficiency in the FhirPath evaluator and...

When parsing finishes with issues, a `DeserializationFailedException` is thrown. This will signal to most people that deserialization has failed. However, this is not actually the intent: some of the issues...

At the Jan 2024 WGM Grahame spoke about how he had sat down with Michael Lawley and worked on testcases for terminology services to nail down the appropriate HTTP result...

The source code here: https://github.com/hapifhir/org.hl7.fhir.core/commit/4b1488438e2922fec9cf0149a68d032ad72f6c42#diff-28feade0b17c7381ef50349eb88f754bf0c4320469b67432226ce6619bc5cc90 lists code that is comparable to our StructureDefinitionCorrectionsResolver. We should check that we have these fixes, and conversely, report to the Java guys any fixes...