Evan Hubinger

@akdor1154 Allowing almost everything as an expression actually would likely be possible without breaking the rule that all valid Python 3 is valid Coconut, but I'm not convinced that there's...

@moigagoo Yes, I agree, I think that's the right way to implement this.

@Boscillator Good question! I would assume just an iterator, but I'm not familiar enough with `asyncio` to really know what the most idiomatic way to implement this would be—maybe it...

Thanks for the issue! I'll look into this and see what I can do for the next version.

@datnamer @TomAugspurger It doesn't resolve this issue, but I thought you should know that in v1.1.1, I added a methodcaller implicit partial, which I believe should be a big help...

Now that there's [a PEP for this](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0638/), Coconut could try to implement it.

I think there is still reason to allow the command-line flags, so new proposal is to just reuse the command-line syntax for overwriting those flags for a specific file, as...

Alternate Syntax: ``` def ( ) : ( ) = ``` Or Even: ``` def `( )` : `( )` = ```

New proposal is to use original definition syntax, but then refer to user-defined functions the same way, like so: ``` a `++` b = a.join(b) " " `++` [0, 1,...

A nice way to make these importable across modules would be to compile this: ``` def a `++` b: pass a `++` b ``` to something like this: ``` def...