Evan Prodromou

I'm going to add these two points as clarifying notes in the [ActivityPub Primer](https://www.w3.org/wiki/Activity_Streams/Primer). I think there is some room for extension properties that could be used instead for "in...

I think the easiest way to do this is with a FEP that specifies a time-zone-independent start time property, like `startTimeLocal` and `endTimeLocal`. I'm also going to add the primer...

We already have a primer page on this, so I am going to close the issue. The `needs-fep` flag will continue to indicate that a vocabulary extension may be warranted....

This is a good catch! We should probably replace it with a more appropriate and registered link rel. @ThisIsMissEm noted that [preview](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6903.html#section-3) may be a sufficient candidate rel. This seems...

All four of your bullet points are probably valid errata, and we could probably do them all in one shot. I'd also change "user" to "actor" in the paragraph, to...

[Proposed erratum](https://www.w3.org/wiki/ActivityPub_errata/Proposed) added: > The outbox stream contains activities the actor has published, subject to the ability of the requester to retrieve the activity (that is, the contents of the...

Moving the actor question to a separate ticket.

I think this makes sense. Let's mark it as Next Version, and we'll consider it when we open up the Working Group.

> In order to make the friendships verifiable by third-party servers, I think exposing the `Follow` activities would be nice. I think if it's defined as the intersection between followers...

> What's the user story here? The first is for the actor themselves to see who their mutual follows are. The second is to make the collection addressable; it's a...