Evan Prodromou

Wiki updated, so closing this issue.

There's a link from here to there. I don't see the point of adding a link from the primer back to this issue, so no.

Coming back to this issue after 5 years, I think the best way to continue this primer work is with the W3C wiki. That will let us get started with...

I think the right resolution here, based on @gobengo 's experience and recommendations, is to leave the accuracy as a percentage confidence measurement, and update the `as:radius` definition to clarify...

This seems like an error to me. I added an erratum here: https://github.com/w3c/activitystreams/pull/550

I appreciate the input, but I think with an established specification, we don't have a lot of optionality in making editorial changes right now. I personally think the idea of...

@bobwyman brings up the good point that we can discuss these terms without necessarily making a change to the ActivityPub spec. In that spirit, I'd like to create a Primer...

As mentioned in the initial issue, this would be a normative change, so we can't actually update the doc with it until we have a working group chartered. (Which we...

@dclements so, this is helpful advice, but it feels like it starts off very meta, and then gets down to some specifics. I don't know if the first half of...

> The ActivityPub spec does not describe / implement a `replies` collection. https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/#dfn-replies