Evan Prodromou

This is a problem with the way the spec was generated; reSpec doesn't differentiate between uppercase and lowercase terms in links. We see the same problem with https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/#dfn-object for `Object`...

Based on this suggestion, in issue triage, we reviewed all the properties with domain `Link` in the vocabulary document. `nameMap`, `preview`, and `attributedTo` were all left out. To resolve this,...

I believe the restriction's intention is to suggest that only `Object` and `Link` objects belong in the `items` property. I think that this is common usage, but not well-enforced. The...

@gobengo has created an OWL ontology by scraping the HTML document. It's visible here: https://github.com/gobengo/activitystreams2-spec-scraped/blob/master/data/activitystreams-vocabulary/1528589057.json I think it's valuable to everyone to have non-normative descriptions of the specification in different...

In issue triage, we decided that the proper way to maintain this document is to move it to its own repository in GitHub, and solicit more volunteer contributions. Consequently, we've...

Based on conversation in the SocialCG meeting, and the fact that this document is referred to in our normative text, we will continue maintaining it in this repository as a...

Noting here that as the current editor of the AS2 documents, I'm taking responsiblity for managing this OWL document, with the help of the SocialCG and the larger AS2 community.

@aschrijver I added a section to the primer page on Collections about this property to make it clearer. https://www.w3.org/wiki/Activity_Streams/Primer/Collections#current_property I think that resolves this issue, so I'll close it if...

This is an editorial error in the vocabulary document. The best next step is to add a note in the ERRATA about the error.

This is an interesting idea. It's also an area of a lot of conversation in the fediverse. It's not currently part of AS2, so it would need to be an...