eric

Great! On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 03:08 Bartosz wrote: > Thanks for the info. If everything goes well, I'm gonna use it too :) > > > > >...

I think parameterizing the `ReduxReactClass` with `action` could be a good way to go. Though, I think I'd swap the ordering: ```purescript type ReduxReactClass' action state props = ReduxReactClass action...

Sounds good to me to make everything uniform. I think whatever parameter order makes sense for how the type is used would be best (e.g., if we needed to partially...

I agree that the view of the actions are currently not too useful in the redux devtools. I will have to take a closer look at how to improve this....

Nice. Thanks for sharing. I wonder if there is a way to move the serialize/deserialize into PureScript and use Argonaut's `EncodeJson` and `DecodeJson`. This would mean that `Action` would have...

Indeed, generic would work. Good idea.

Wow! Thanks @zalmoxisus for the ideas and pointers. This looks like just what we need. https://github.com/zalmoxisus/redux-devtools-extension/blob/master/docs/API/Arguments.md#parameters zalmoxisus/redux-devtools-extension#278

Thanks for checking out `purescript-angular`. I admit that the bindings have fallen out of date. I am not sure when I will have a chance to tackle making more updates,...

I like your proposal. Makes sense. If you are interested in opening up a PR for this change, it would definitely be welcome. I can also make the update if...