eric

Thanks for checking out the `purs-loader`. I agree it would be handy to use `Main.purs` as the entry directly. I will have to look into whether webpack supports something like...

This does in fact work. See: ethul/purescript-webpack-example@923f3c1d79cee40e6d6b488cd2f985f484e17af3

Agreed. You're totally correct. I was too soon on closing this. I've been updating the example further. Please see: https://github.com/ethul/purescript-webpack-example/blob/30265626f89b605bf24be94a8f7fadd2610bcd23/src/Example.purs#L17-L25

Right. So you can return an `Eff` instead of performing the IO, but I am unsure how webpack would know to run this. Maybe the loader could create a wrapper...

@saevarb Thanks for your feedback. Does your issue relate to #33 or are you describing a new issue? If you are able to provide a little more explanation on how...

Thanks for this. I will have to spend some time to see if something like this could be supported. However, if you are willing to take a look, a documentation...

According to the [PureScript documentation](https://github.com/purescript/documentation/blob/master/guides/FFI-Tips.md#avoid-directly-calling-ps-code-from-foreign-modules), it recommended not to call PS code from foreign modules. In light of this, I don't know if this is a case that should be...

At the moment, I am not sure how this can be solved in the purs-loader. I am still open to ideas. Another way to solve this might be to create...

Thanks for the report. I haven't tried the purs-loader on webpack 3.x or too much on 2.x. Perhaps there is some kind of incompatibility. I will have to investigate this...

I've [updated the dependencies of the example](https://github.com/ethul/purescript-webpack-example/commit/392fce565a02787f2a963ff083d1697d90cb2d68) and didn't notice recompilation occurring with or without bundling. Are you able to reproduce this issue using the `purescript-webpack-example`? Thanks! Note that I...