Add ERC: Human readable names for Interoperable Addresses

[jrudolf]

[eip-review-bot]

✅ All reviewers have approved.

[lukepuplett]

My apologies if I'm in the wrong place, I've not done this before. I'm here to comment on this proposal. My feedback is simply to think about how it might map to blockchain agnostic representations, notably this one:

https://github.com/ChainAgnostic/CAIPs/blob/main/CAIPs/caip-10.md

Thank you.

[lucemans]

Heya! ENS already supports this from the get go!

Have a look at ENSIP-9 (defining different records for different chains) https://docs.ens.domains/ensip/9

And the documentation around it at: https://docs.ens.domains/web/resolution#multi-chain

This doesnt solve readability but it does introduce a method for fetching addresses for a certain chain id.

With regards to testnets you can make the queries to the ENS deployments on their respective chains. (So for Base Sepolia you would check Sepolia ENS)

[iJaack]

@lucemans I believe ENSIP-9 doesn’t actually solve the issue, but gives redundancy in case this only gets applied to the stricter Ethereum ecosystem. The whole reason to do this multi-chain resolution is to allow for ‘clean names’ based on a widely used primitive: chainID. ENSIP-9 builds on top of this with another identification system, while this ERC is an alternative.

BTW thank you for mentioning, it’s actually a great feature of ENS that could be publicized more!

[SamWilsn]

Please keep technical discussion on the forum: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/erc-7828-chain-specific-addresses-using-ens/21930

[u59149403]

@lucemans

Have a look at ENSIP-9 (defining different records for different chains) https://docs.ens.domains/ensip/9

ENSIP-9 tries to support not only EVM chains, but also bitcoin, etc. This is good thing. But it invents its own way to refer to various chains. This is bad. New version of ENSIP-9 should be created, which refers to caip-10 ( https://chainagnostic.org/CAIPs/caip-10 ) instead. Everybody should stick to CAIP-10. See also this very good comment: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/chain-specific-addresses/6449/28 by rekmarks

[github-actions[bot]]

The commit 19194805e1a464da3acd7e3b69a9f03e2478eac2 (as a parent of c9254c17a7a9322e563831c9ca5782d1030f447e) contains errors. Please inspect the Run Summary for details.