Ethan White

👋 @rudeboybert, @valentina-s. Thanks again for agreeing to review this paper. Since we're now two weeks into the review process, I just wanted to check in and see if either...

👋 @rudeboybert, @valentina-s. We're now a little over 4 weeks into the review, which means you've got a little under two weeks to finish things up. Please let me know...

Thanks to @rudeboybert and @valentina-s for making progress on their checklists and opening issues in core repo. Let me know when you've completed your initial reviews and then I'll look...

Thanks @valentina-s! @rudeboybert - are you finished with you initial review? If not, can you provide an estimate of when you're hoping to finish it?

Thanks for your thorough reviews and associated issues @valentina-s & @rudeboybert! @zdelrosario - Please address the suggestions made by the reviewers in the issues in your repo and let us...

Thanks @henrykironde. I totally believe that this will fix things and that this is why we had that version pegged in the first place, but I'm confused as why. The...

Is this issue reproducible? It seems unlikely this is a broad issue since we install regularly on all sorts of testing environments, so this must be an edge case of...

Thanks @unsatisfying - this is a good point and I should have read the initial issue a little more carefully. We'll see what we can do

From the opencv docs: >You should always use [the headless] packages if you do not use cv2.imshow et al. or you are using some other package (such as PyQt) than...

Based on recent discussions we are viewing model training and releasing as handled separately from this repository. Given that I'm wondering if this issue should be closed or moved elsewhere.